We took a brief trip to San Francisco early this month. Katie has a graduate student who was presenting at the American Geophysical Union (AGU) December meeting. We left Tucson during the afternoon of Wednesday, December 5th, and arrived at SFO after dark and just behind the last of the heavy rains that week. We took the BART into downtown and walked up the hill to our hotel. We actually had a great view from our room (a bit different than the usual city view of adjacent brick walls). The photo below was taken
from the room, looking down on the Christmas tree in Union Square Park and ice skaters to its left. In the background is the large Macy's store, where we had a late dinner at one of celebrity Chef Hubert Keller's Burger Bars - an interesting but noisy place.
On Thursday, I walked the streets of San Francisco, sort of like Karl Malden, but in search of bookstores to investigate. Did have some success - more on that later. Katie and her student spent the day at the AGU meetings down at the Convention Center. We had dinner in a nice Italian restaurant on Sutter Street, Cesario's. It has mixed online reviews, but we were lucky and had a very good dinner there. On Friday morning morning I returned to a bookstore, while Katie finished attending another session at the AGU.
We then met Katie's sister, Lisa, and her husband Jim, and took a cab over to the Old Ft. Mason area. Great views on the sunny day we had - below is a panoramic photo I grabbed from the internet. The Ft. is now under the care of the National Park Service and is home to restaurants, museums, and stores, as well as a great Friends of the Library bookstore. We had reservations at a well-known, vegetarian restaurant - Greens. Details about this wonderful restaurant are at their website - http://www.greensrestaurant.com/
This was the third time we'd gone to the restaurant and it is one of our San Francisco favorites. While we were eating, a seal popped up next to the pier to take a look at what was happening. I shot the photo of
him/her right from my chair in the restaurant - picking up some artifacts from the window. I also got a restricted shot of a large cargo ship (below) steaming into the Bay after a long trip across the Pacific. It is
loaded with hundreds of truck-sized shipping containers, undoubtedly filled with cheap goods from China that are headed to WalMart stores across the country. So it goes. After we finished our visit to Ft. Mason, Lisa and Jim headed off to do some shopping before heading back to Davis. Katie and I took a taxi back to downtown and then the BART back to SFO for an evening flight home.
The bookstore that I visited at length during this trip was the Argonaut Book Shop at 786 Sutter Street.
Above shows the store from across the street - will be hard to see when those newly planted trees mature. Photo below shows an interior shot that captured owner Robert D. Haines, Jr., sitting at his desk back there on the left side. The store was founded in 1941 by Robert D. Haines, and was a founding member of the Antiquarian Booksellers' Association of America. Bob has run the store for the last 40 years. I have visited here each time we've been in San Francisco and spent hours browsing the shelves, always finding a few .
items that are too tempting to leave behind. Angela C. Haines and Aaron C. Haines have joined their father in the business, becoming third-generation booksellers. Details concerning the Argonaut are at:
http://www.argonautbookshop.com/
Some of the items that returned to Tucson with us are shown here. Above are two books concerning the "Apache Kid," who evolved from a trusted Army scout into a hated and hunted outlaw. I hope that some of my customers who study Southwest history may find these titles of interest. Below is a Steinbeck-related item. It is actually a beautifully produced brochure advising of The Yolla Bolly Press' publication of a special, limited edition of Steinbeck's Zapata. Wish that I had one of the limited editions to show, but the brochure is a rare and interesting item itself. So, that's a brief summary of our quick, end-of-the year trip.
About this blog
Saturday, December 22, 2012
Thursday, December 20, 2012
Squid Ink Holiday Catalogue Available
Squid Ink Books Holiday Catalogue for 2012 is now available. I can send a pdf version electronically, or a hard copy via snail mail. If you'd like to browse a copy, send me an e-mail. bob@squidinkbooks.com
Tuesday, November 13, 2012
Two Very Different Nonfiction Titles
I have gotten ahead of this blog in my reading and will try to catch up during
the next few weeks.
This sketchy autobiography consists of five
chapters, each written as if it were a short story and each with a somewhat
surprising ending. It was a work in progress when he died and was discovered as
a typescript in a safe deposit box after Woolrich died. The reader really doesn't learn much about his life reading these five stories. However, Bassett has
added substantial annotations to explain things that Woolrich mentions in the stories.
Did Adam and Eve Have Navels? Subtitled: “Discourses on Reflexology, Numerology,
Urine Therapy, and Other Dubious Subjects.” By Martin Gardner; published by
Norton in 2000. Copies are readily available at $10 to $20.
Martin Gardner (born
21 October 1914, in Tulsa, Oklahoma; died 22 May 2010, in Norman, Oklahoma) was
the long-time (25 years) author of the Scientific
American column “Mathematical Games.” He was also a frequent contributor to
The Skeptical Inquirer. Gardner was a prolific
writer and there are numerous books by him. This book collects a number of his
columns, mostly from The Skeptical
Inquirer. One of his long-term missions in life was to debunk bogus science
and expose frauds, such as the famous spoon-bender, Uri Geller. This book is
wide-ranging, and I especially enjoyed: “The Great Egg-Balancing Mystery”; “Zero-Point
Energy and Harold Puthoff”; “Claiborne Pell, Senator [Rhode Island] from Outer
Space”; “Thomas Edison, Paranormalist”; “Isaac Newton, Alchemist and
Fundamentalist.” It is interesting that while Senator Pell was a believer in
psychic phenomena and had a Geller-bent spoon hanging on his office wall, he
was also a six-term Senator and introduced the bill that led to Pell Grants. I
picked this book up to read and its next stop will be in a donation to our local
Friends of the Library.
------------------------------------------------
Blues of a Lifetime Subtitled: “The Autobiography of Cornell
Woolrich.” Edited, annotated, and with an introduction by Mark T. Bassett;
published by Bowling Green State University Popular Press in 1991. The book was
simultaneously issued in hardback and trade paperback. The print run of hard
covers was probably small, and this is a difficult book to find in collectible
condition. Copies have probably gone to the libraries of collectors of
Woolrich's books.
Woolrich (born
Cornell George Hopley-Woolrich on 4 December 1903 in New York City , died there on 25 September
1968) lived a strange and somewhat mysterious life. Except for a period spent
in Mexico
with his father during his youth, he lived much of his life in NYC. He was a
long-time resident of several hotels and lived with his mother until she died
in 1957. He attended Columbia
University but did not
graduate, leaving sometime after his first novel, Cover Charge, was published in 1926. He spent time as a
screenwriter in Hollywood
but the exact dates are not clear. He wrote as Cornell Woolrich, William Irish,
and George Hopley. Many of his short stories and mysteries were adapted into film noir screenplays. A short story,
“It Had to be Murder,” led to Hitchcock’s movie Rear Window. His “Black” novels are the most coveted by collectors
and include: The Bride Wore Black, Black
Alibi, The Black Angel, and three others. Collectible copies of the early
“Black” mysteries, in original dust jackets, are scarce and usually command
prices of $1000 and up.
Tuesday, October 9, 2012
The End Of The World - Part 1
I have been reading
several cold war novels from the late 1950s and early 1960s, and then Katie and
I have been watching related movies. This period was the most intense portion
of the cold war, after Russia
had developed its own arsenal of nuclear weapons. Those of us who were in
school way back then remember the numerous Civil Defense recommendations,
especially bomb shelters of both public and private types. In essence all of
these programs were psychological propaganda to give the public a feel that if atomic
war happened there was hope, if they were prepared. Two examples are shown
below. A poster telling you what to do if a bomb suddenly flashed in the sky
was an example of this propaganda. In the Midwestern schools I went to, we had
frequent preparedness drills, particularly “Duck and Cover,” as per the first photo. The “Duck and Cover” drill was also essentially practice for tornado
warnings, where it actually made some sense.
I recently finished
reading Nevil Shute’s On the Beach.
Shute was an Englishman who had successful careers as an aeronautical engineer
(using his full name of Nevil Shute Norway ) and as an author. He wrote
more than 20 novels and was an extremely popular author during the years after
WWII. Not surprisingly, many of his novels had aviation aspects. Distressed
with the way things were evolving in England
after the war, he moved his family to Australia in 1950. In Australia he
also had a brief career racing sports cars. He died, a victim of a stroke, in
1960 at age 60.
On the Beach was published in 1957 by Heinemann in the UK , and also by William Morrow in the US . First
editions of both versions are not difficult to find; however, condition is
often an issue and higher prices ($100 to $300) usually are asked for copies
that have survived in Very Good to Fine condition (although, as is sadly
typical, prices on the internet are all over the place). The book spent 29
weeks on the New York Times best seller list reaching the number 2 spot, but
never quite making it to the top. The copy shown below is a UK first
edition.
The story takes
place mostly in Australia
during the 1960s, following a nuclear war in the northern hemisphere, where
nuclear blasts and radiation have obliterated civilization. Shute avoids
directly accusing the two nuclear super-powers of starting this war (he has it
begin with an unlikely exchange of atomic attacks between Italy and Albania ), however all atomic
nations quickly joined the exchanges. Post-war radiation levels are extreme and
are gradually circulating on the winds into the southern hemisphere. Radiation
sickness is progressing southward, as evidenced by sequential losses of
communications from northern cities. Melbourne
is the southernmost major city in the world, and this is where Shute lived and
where he set much of On the Beach.
The story follows five people as they face the end of the world and their own deaths. This was a
grim story for grim, frightening times. Peter Holmes, an officer in the
Australian Navy, and his wife Mary (they have an infant daughter) live outside
of Melbourne, and he commutes back and forth to the Naval yards as best he can
(petrol is extremely scarce and folks are getting around mainly by horse or
bicycle). Commander Dwight Towers
has piloted his US nuclear
submarine to Australia
after surviving the war, which occurred during an extended cruise. He has put
his submarine at the beck and call of the Australian Navy, since there is no
longer a US Navy. Moira Davidson, a young woman whom the Holmes introduced to
Towers, has become his nearly constant companion, but not lover. Moira is
trying to cope with the approach of death by drinking heavily at every
opportunity. Dwight is coping by holding delusions that all is well with his
family back in the states, and that he’ll see them again.
The Australian Navy
sends Towers on a short voyage to search for life in Australia ’s northern cities. Peter
Holmes is assigned to the submarine as Australian Navy liaison, and a young
scientist, John Osborne, is also sent along to monitor radiation levels. The
voyage reveals no indications of life in northern Australia . Towers is next asked to
cruise as far north in the Pacific as possible, again searching for indications
of survivors. He is also ordered to investigate strange, intermittent radio
signals coming from near Seattle .
The results of this long voyage are the same. One crew member of the sub
abandons ship near Seattle
and rows away to see his home town. He must stay ashore because of the
radiation, but he does report to Towers from a fishing boat that everyone is
dead or gone.
The sub returns to
Melbourne and the rest of the story focuses on the final activities of the five
key characters. As radiation levels increase, the government provides suicide
pills, or injections, for those who want them. There is sports car racing, as
enthusiasts who had saved petrol stashes hold a final Australian Gran Prix. The
scientist, John Osborne, races his prized Ferrari and wins the final race.
There is an amusing dilemma posed for Australian bureaucrats – should trout
fishing season be opened early? Eventually Dwight and Moira go off on a chaste,
fishing junket in the mountains. During the final few days, the principals use
the suicide pills, except for Towers and a small crew. They sail the US submarine to
international waters and scuttle the ship, going down with her. This is the way
the world ends. On the Beach is a
serious read, and my main reflection is that it was essentially a miracle that
the world survived the era of mutual destruction strategies.
The Movie
The movie version of
On the Beach was released in 1959.
The screenplay was written by John Paxton and the film was directed by Stanley
Kramer. The main players were: Gregory Peck (Dwight Towers ),
Ava Gardner (Moira Davidson), Anthony Perkins (Peter Holmes), Fred Astaire
(John Osborne, but called Julian Osborn in the film), and character actress
Donna Anderson in her first film appearance (Mary Holmes). We thought he film
was quite well done, especially considering it is a story of the end of the
world. The black and white was especially appropriate. The casting was,
however, a bit “off” regarding two characters. Moira was a young woman in her
middle 20s in the book, but Gardner
was nearly 40 when the film was shot. Osbourne was a young scientist, but
Astaire, in his first dramatic role, was 60 years old when he acted in this
film. The screenplay by Paxton made many changes from the details of Shute’s
story. Among others: in the movie Towers and his crew decide to return to their
home base and are seen cruising away from Australia at the end of the movie; in
the movie the mysterious radio signal is coming from an oil refinery along the
coast near San Diego, rather than from somewhere near Seattle. However, the
most substantial change that Kramer and Paxton made was that Towers and Moira
obviously become lovers near the end of the film. This enraged Shute and Peck
also argued against the change. From http://www.nevilshute.org/
In
spite of its many accolades, Nevil Shute hated the film. He was enraged by its
production to the extent that Shirley Norway believes his anger over the film
hastened his death.
Like
all his best stories, "On The Beach" was about ordinary
people faced with extraordinary circumstances, rising to the occasion, and
behaving very well. The problem was that Nevil felt behaving very well included
remaining true to one's dead spouse. In the book, Captain Dwight
Towers refused to give in
to his passion for the Australian beauty Moira, and she was above trying to
seduce him into betraying his dead wife. In the film, Towers, played by Gregory
Peck, and Moira, played by Ava Gardner, left no doubt about whether or not
their relationship was consummated. Nevil felt that this destroyed the central
message of the book.
Notwithstanding
Nevil's dislike of the film, it is a classic, and the power of its message is
as strong today as it ever was.
The Nevil Shute web
site also has perspectives on the movie from Ava Gardner and Gregory Peck – see
the “Flimography” section.
Finally, the US Department
of Defense and the Navy refused to cooperate with Kramer during the filming.
The submarine used in the movie is a British, Royal Navy, non-nuclear vessel.
Our Defense department felt that the movie was too negative, and that the
existing nuclear arsenals of the US
and Russia
were not large enough to result in complete destruction if there were a war.
Wednesday, September 19, 2012
Back To Dealey Plaza
Since I had taken the time to read Stephen King’s time travel novel relating to the Kennedy assassination, I decided to read a bit more about the events of November 22, 1963. It happened that Don DeLillo’s novel, Libra, was sitting on my “to read” shelves (as are a couple of hundred other books). I’ve just completed his book and will share some comments.
Libra was published in August of 1988 (25 years after the assassination) by
Viking. The book is 456 pages long. Signed copies of the 1st printing can be found
at around $75 to $100. The book was on the New York Times bestseller list for
only 4 weeks – never getting higher than 13 - and had fallen off by the time
November 1988 rolled around. DeLillo won the National Book Award (Fiction) for White Noise and Libra, his next novel, was a finalist for the same award.
Even though DeLillo’s
novel is built upon fact, he has done an amazing job of blending his fictionalization
with actual events and characters. It is hard for the reader to realize when
facts meld into DeLillo’s story of how things might have happened. The
characters are complex and they move within many fuzzy subplots, most of which
converge in Dallas ’ Dealey Plaza
on November 22nd. The main focus is, of course, on Lee Harvey Oswald and his
strange life on the fringes of society, both here and in Russia . Other
key characters include a variety of CIA agents, retired or semi-retired, anti-Castro
Cubans, mobsters, FBI informants, and Jack Ruby, who seemed to have had some
association with almost all of the other players.
DeLillo’s position
is that the assassination was a conspiracy, or scheme, or plot that took on a
life of its own, often driven by elements of chance and even chaos. There was
no real structure or leader or even very good communication. Things just
evolved. The tipping-point event that triggered all of this was the failed Bay
of Pigs invasion of Cuba
(April 1961). The invasion was orchestrated by the CIA, working with Cuban
refugees. The CIA hoped to persuade the young President (who had been in office
for less than 3 months) to authorize USAF air support, once the invaders were
struggling onshore. Kennedy refused, as he had warned he would, but many in the
CIA, as well as Cuban refugees in the U.S. , felt they’d been terribly betrayed.
In the novel, several
quasi-retired CIA agents develop a scheme designed to focus the country, and the
administration, against Castro. A failed assassination attempt on JFK that
could be traced directly back to Castro would get things back on track. Lee
Harvey Oswald just happens to surface in key places at key times, and the
conspirators decide he would be the perfect patsy in their scheme. I won’t go
into the details of Oswald’s life that make up much of the core of the novel.
The reader knows what is going to happen in Dallas ,
but how all the subplots evolve into the shots in Dealey Plaza
is the intrigue in this read. Indeed, wouldn’t an assassination actually be
better than a failed attempt?
The difference
between the King and DeLillo novels is huge – one is an easy, but very long
read, and the other requires the reader to pay very careful attention. Libra is definitely not for all readers.
George Will hated the book and railed publically against it – from my
perspective, that’s a damn good endorsement. Anne Tyler wrote a very
comprehensive, and positive, review of Libra.
I found, as I worked through Libra, that I often grabbed a different
book to help me follow the players and the details. This book, The Assassination Please Almanac, was
the first published book of local writer Tom Miller. It was published by
Regnery Press as a magazine-sized, soft cover book in 1977. It is a
comprehensive, actually amazing, collection of factoids and media quotes
relevant to the assassination. After being out of print for many years, it is
now available as a “Print-On-Demand” book.
From the front cover
– “This sourcebook/collection is the nerviest in years.” Rolling Stone
From the back cover
– “The Assassination Please Almanac
is a consumer’s guide to conspiracy theories, an annotated bibliography of JFK
assassination books, a chronology of events leading up to and away from
November 22, 1963, and a black humor look at the Kennedy assassination. A rare
find in high demand on the assassobuff circuit, now back in print for all to appreciate.” Publisher’s blurb
Thursday, September 6, 2012
Comments on: "The Sweetness at the Bottom of the Pie"
I recently picked up
a copy of Alan Bradley’s “The Sweetness at the Bottom of the Pie.” It caught my
eye while I was browsing in a Bookman’s. I had heard some good things about and
bought it to read. The book was published in the U.S.
by Delacorte in 2009 (apparently published nearly simultaneously by Orion in
the UK and Doubleday in Canada ). It was
issued in pictorial boards (see above), without a dust jacket, that are
rather fragile. The author is from western Canada and has turned his heroine
into a full-fledged business – see www.flaviadeluce.com.
The novel is
essentially a “cozy” mystery featuring an eleven-year old English girl, Flavia
de Luce, who is a child prodigy. Her specialty is chemistry, especially
poisons. Her mother is deceased and her well-to-do father spends all of his
time with his stamp collection. She has two sisters and the three girls are
quite different from each other. They live in an English Country mansion and
the story is set in 1950. She has inherited a complete chemistry lab that had
been created by a decreased relative, who had lived at one time in the family
mansion. The mystery revolves around a stranger who is found, by Flavia, dying
in the cucumber patch. It is murder, but the authorities can’t seem to figure
that out. The book is a delightful and entertaining read.
A complete review
can be found at: http://literarycornercafe.blogspot.com/search?q=sweetness
What’s a “cozy”
mystery? – think of Angela Lansbury and her TV series, “Murder She Wrote.” Want
to know more details about “Cozy” mysteries? See www.cozy-mystery.com
When I read a book
of any type or genre, I am not happy unless I learn some new things along the
way. I was not happy with King’s book (see previous post) because I didn’t feel
I learned any new. However, after reading Bradley’s book, I know some more
about British stamps and chemistry. However, the thing that intrigued me most
was the question: Did Bradley read Oliver Sacks’ “Uncle Tungsten – Memories of
a Chemical Boyhood” (see below) before he came up with his heroine? Sacks’
autobiographical account of his boyhood in England has many similarities with
Flavia’s situation. Oliver grew up in a family mansion, in London , and inherited a complete laboratory
on an upper floor. This was where he hide away doing experiments, much like
Flavia. An interesting coincidence, or was Bradley inspired by Oliver’s
chemistry adventures?
Finally, “The
Sweetness at the Bottom of the Pie” has won an amazing number of awards,
including: The Agatha Award, Arthur Ellis Award, Barry Award, Debut Dagger
Award, the Dilys Award, and the Macvity Award.
I definitely
recommend this one (as well as any of Oliver Sacks’ books!).
Sunday, August 26, 2012
A Review Of "11/22/63" by Stephen King
I am not much of a
fan of Stephen King, and I have read only two of his novels. These two were “The
Shining” and “Firestarter.” I read “The
Shining” when it was published back in 1977. I had seen the Stanley Hotel up in
Estes Park , and I enjoyed the read. I
certainly have never forgotten Kubrick’s movie, nor Jack Nicholson’s performance.
I really don’t remember much about “Firestarter,” since I read it over 30 years
ago and did not see the movie.
I have tended, over
the years, to agree with John Dunning’s comments regarding Stephen King. In his
classic bibliomystery, “Booked to Die,” Cliff Janeway is scouting along Denver ’s Book Row on East
Colfax. An old dealer sells Janeway a first of “The Shining” for $4.00. Janeway
tells him he’s not charging enough for the book. The dealer replies: “I don’t
believe in Steffan King.” Many years and many King books have come and gone,
and I’ve not been tempted to read another. But, a couple of weeks ago I picked
up a copy of King’s “11/22/63.” I remembered that I’d seen good reviews when
Scribner published it in November 2011, 48 years after John F. Kennedy’s assassination.
The book is huge –
849 pages, weighing in at almost 4 pounds. I certainly didn’t read through it
quickly. I figure that I averaged 20 to 30 pages at a sitting, and so picked it
up and set it down many times, getting some real exercise.
The tales told here
by King revolve around a fantasy type of time travel (i.e., a Jack Finney way
of easing back into the past) – quite different than science fiction tales
where there is a “machine” or some deterministic control over time travel. As I
was reading early sections of the book I was somewhat reminded of time travel
tales from the 1950s. Ray Bradbury’s short story, “A Sound of Thunder” (a
dinosaur hunting expedition changes politics back in the future), or Wilson
Tucker’s “The Lincoln Hunters” (again with politics at play in time). In fact,
after I’d been thinking of the connections, King’s main character refers to
“The Lincoln Hunters,” so King may have been a member of the Science Fiction
Book Club back in the 1950’s.
I can’t summarize
King’s book here, since it is so long and very convoluted. The primary plot
revolves around Jake Epping (aka George Amberson), who returns to 1963 to
prevent the assassination of JFK. A dying friend, who runs a café, has
discovered a tangle in the strings of time that allows him to step back into
the past, always into 1958. No matter how long the time traveler remains in the
past, when he returns to the present only two minutes have gone by. This is the
first quirky aspect of time travel ala Stephen King. Another is that the
traveler has physically aged whatever length of time he/she spent in the past.
Jake is urged by his friend to step through the time tangle and experience
1958. He does this a number of times, until the dying café owner convinces him
that he should remain in the past for 5 years and prevent JFK’s assassination.
So, this is the basic thread of the book – Jake Epping, school teacher from
2011, steps back in time to 1958 and stays until 1963, when he will try to prevent
the assassination.
Unfortunately, King
can’t head straight down the main plotline. He adds a large number of confusing,
and at times quite slow, subplots. There’s one about a young woman disabled in
a hunting accident, that’s replayed several times. There’s a much longer tale
about a dreary, factory town in Maine ,
where a man goes off the deep-end and murders his entire family. Then there’s a
subplot about the mob, bookies, and betting on sporting events whose outcomes
Jake already knows (this is how he funds his long stay in the past). There’s a
love story, after George meets Sadie, a 1958 high school teacher in a
fictional, Texas town south of Dallas . George has gotten
a job as a substitute teacher to help both his finances and to pass five years
while he waits for the fatal date to arrive. This story is very long and
involved and introduces yet another
violent and crazy character. The love story has its own subplots. It appears
that King has gathered together a number of short stories and novellas, not
previously published, and hammered them into the time travel plot of this book.
No wonder it’s so massive.
There is an extended
account of George shadowing Lee Harvey Oswald, so that he can learn whether or
not Oswald is acting on his or if there is a conspiracy. King has to provide
his answer to this question that will never go away. However, getting to an
answer takes up several hundreds of pages that are not very interesting, and
this part of the tale drags along. The final hundred or so pages are the best
part of this novel, as events, characters, the Kennedy motorcade, and time
converge on Dealey
Plaza . It’s an
interesting climax, but the effort required of the reader to get here is
substantial.
And then there’s the
final and fatal quirk of King’s version of time travel. The time string of 1958
“resets” to exactly how it was the previous time the traveler had stepped into
1958. This is a real “What the hell?” aspect of the novel. It allows Jake to go
back again and again to redo things in the past, if he doesn’t like how 2011
turned out due to his fiddling in his previous trip. This aspect of King’s
story deflates the tensions and suspense associated with more classic, time travel,
science fiction stories. Recommended only to folks who have a lot of time on
their hands.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)